http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=3595
Anandov poprililično opširan review novog iPhonea. Stvar koja mi je zapala za oko je, da Anand koristi svaku priliku da reklamira intel, a isto tako i da pomene AMD u negativnom kontekstu :trust:
pa kakve veze ima intel sa iPhoneom... :trust:
idem da procitam tekst ...
EDIT:
jel se ovaj Anand drogira
: potrošio je ceo pasus, koji je uz to nazvao
"A Call to Action" gde lupeta kako treba da znamo koji je procesor u iPhoneu, zatim koliko kešta ima... i sve ostale gluposti preslikane iz PC sveta:
"A Call to Action
This leads me to a further point: we need more transparency in specs from smartphone manufacturers. The mobile phone market is all too shielded from the performance metrics and accountability that we’ve had in the PC space. When Intel was shipping Pentium 4s that performed slower than the Pentium IIIs they were replacing, we called them out on it. To this day, Apple refuses to talk about the processor in the iPhone 3GS. We get to hear all about what’s in the Nehalem Mac Pro, but the hardware behind the 3GS is off limits - despite the fact that it’s very good. This policy of not delivering specifics and a general unwillingness to talk about specs is absurd at best. It doesn’t take much more than a teardown and some homebrew code to figure out what CPU at what frequency is in any modern day smartphone; manufacturers should show pride in their hardware, or refrain from putting something inside a phone that’s they can’t be proud of.
What we need are cache sizes, clock speeds, full architecture disclosures. They don’t have to be on the phone’s marketing materials but make them accessible and at least some of the focus. These SoCs are so incredibly cool, they pack more power than the desktops of 10 years ago into a single chip smaller than my thumbnail - boast about them! Palm had a tremendous leg up on the competition with its OMAP 3430 processor, yet there was hardly any attention paid to it by Palm. I get that the vast majority of consumers don’t get, but those who do, would help tremendously if given access to this information. It’s something to get excited about.
And if the manufacturers won’t devote time and energy to this stuff, then I will."
dobro. ajmo dalje...
(njemu dobro idu samo tekstovi o stvarima koje mogu da se izmere štopericom
)
---
definitivno se drogira:
prvo meri brzinu renderovanja web stranica gde mu u tabeli 3G stoji i prvi iPhone (koji NEMA 3G) a zatim ima brzinu preko WiFi gde nema prvog iPhonea!
S-jajan je!
EDIT:
"The TI OMAP 3430 used in the Pre
(good job Palm on full disclosure there, just add clock speeds and you’ll get an A+)" - jadničak! - Anand treba da napiše tekst o hardwareu a nema nikakvu specifikaciju!
pa kuka na sve strane
bottom line: nemojte se truditi da pročitate tekst; nema ničeg pametnog osim pisanja na 100KB gluposti koje nemaju ama baš nikakve veza sa funkcionisanjem iPhonea.
Ali šta ćeš; čovek mora da se prešalta na mobilnu stranu jer kako i sam kaže: "If you're bored by performance improvements on the desktop, then keep an eye on the ultra mobile space."
![[Miki]](/data/avatars/m/5/5360.jpg?1612777309){kind=avatar}
