kovacm
Čuven
- Učlanjen(a)
- 28.01.2005
- Poruke
- 8,607
- Poena
- 870
na osnews.com je dobar, uporedni pregled izjava svih kompanija koje su umesane u PRISM:
First, Google CEO Larry Page:
Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg:
An Apple spokesperson told Reuters:
PalTalk told The Washington Post:
Then there's AOL:
And here's Yahoo:
This looks like a coordinated marketing campaign, with a focus on three elements: we have not heard of PRISM, we only respond to court orders, no direct government access to our servers.
http://www.osnews.com/story/27108/Silicon_Valley_responds_to_PRISM_with_coordinated_PR_campaign
i btw potrudite se da mi ne brisete postove
First, Google CEO Larry Page:
First, we have not joined any program that would give the U.S. government - or any other government - direct access to our servers. Indeed, the U.S. government does not have direct access or a 'back door' to the information stored in our data centers. We had not heard of a program called PRISM until yesterday.
Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg:
Facebook is not and has never been part of any program to give the US or any other government direct access to our servers. We have never received a blanket request or court order from any government agency asking for information or metadata in bulk, like the one Verizon reportedly received. And if we did, we would fight it aggressively. We hadn't even heard of PRISM before yesterday.
An Apple spokesperson told Reuters:
We have never heard of PRISM. We do not provide any government agency with direct access to our servers, and any government agency requesting customer data must get a court order.
PalTalk told The Washington Post:
We have not heard of PRISM. Paltalk exercises extreme care to protect and secure users’ data, only responding to court orders as required to by law. Paltalk does not provide any government agency with direct access to its servers.
Then there's AOL:
We do not have any knowledge of the Prism program. We do not disclose user information to government agencies without a court order, subpoena or formal legal process, nor do we provide any government agency with access to our servers.
And here's Yahoo:
Yahoo! takes users' privacy very seriously. We do not provide the government with direct access to our servers, systems, or network. We provide customer data only when we receive a legally binding order or subpoena to do so, and never on a voluntary basis. In addition we only ever comply with orders for requests about specific accounts or identifiers.
This looks like a coordinated marketing campaign, with a focus on three elements: we have not heard of PRISM, we only respond to court orders, no direct government access to our servers.
http://www.osnews.com/story/27108/Silicon_Valley_responds_to_PRISM_with_coordinated_PR_campaign
i btw potrudite se da mi ne brisete postove
Poslednja izmena: