Šta je novo?
Od:
Filteri

Google Pixel(i) 2016 - off tema

Status
Zatvorena za pisanje odgovora.
hsv.stoned je napisao(la):
http://m.androidcentral.com/google-...feature&utm_campaign=navigation&utm_source=ac

http://m.androidcentral.com/google-pixel-xl-review-us

Koji hvalospevi :)





Sent from my D6503
Kliknite za proširenje...
Ali zato ovi malcice više mainstream mediji tipa NYT

I da citiram:
If you are uninterested in Project Fi and are not deeply invested in Google’s ecosystem, there is another route: Try an iPhone. Apple’s iPhone 7 and 7 Plus outperformed the Pixel in every way in terms of hardware features.
Kliknite za proširenje...

Sad su našli da porede HW, gde su bili kad je SoC razlika bila manja, baterija užas, poređenje ekrana takođe, i kada je iOS dosta više kaskao za Androidom u direktnom poređenju funkcija i mogućnosti

Mi MAX
 
Kamera bolja na iPhoneu, mora biti da je apple koolaid bas jak u times-u.
Mada dzabe, ne pomazu ni svi hvalospevi placenih medija, iphone svaki kvartal belezi sve slabiju prodaju i jedini pozitivni rezultati su uvek u prvih mesec dva po predstavljanju novih telefona.
 
http://www.theverge.com/2016/10/18/...ne-7-samsung-galaxy-s7-edge-camera-comparison

Conclusions

If we’ve learned anything early on in our time with the Pixel, it’s that Google was right to be excited about the main camera on this phone. In most situations it is better than the iPhone 7, and it even beats out the Galaxy S7 in some others. You could make the argument that Apple offers a "flatter," more true-to-life image, or at least one that is better suited for editing. But the chances are that many people don’t want that, or at the very least, it’s not as big a deal-breaker as the rest of a phone’s features. And to my eyes, the iPhone’s photos are starting to look a bit bland in comparison to the photos that are coming out of Google’s and Samsung’s phones. How Apple decides to address this with the next iPhone will be something for photographers to keep an eye on.

For the better part of the last decade, one of the biggest demands from people in the market for a premium smartphone was a great camera. These days, though, it’s a feature you should expect. A good smartphone camera is no longer the deciding factor it once was if only because it’s now so common to find one in a high-end (or even mid-range) phone. These three phones are the perfect example of that. Google may have won the race this time around, but Samsung and Apple made it a photo finish.
Kliknite za proširenje...
[emoji48]


Sent from my D6503
 
Kad ovako napišu even beats S7, jer S7 je dslr zarobljen u telu smartfona jelte [emoji60]

Sent from my Nexus 6P
 
Ne, to je L950, od nje ni Pixeli 2020. nece biti bolji [emoji23]

Sent from my D6503
 
Ma kakvi. Jel moze da se iskljuci to, nisam ispratio?
 
sa tog linka.

However, the Pixel's HDR+ is instant, and here's Levoy's explanation:

"The moment you press the shutter it's not actually taking a shot — it already took the shot. It took lots of shots! What happens when you press the shutter button is it just marks the time when you pressed it, uses the images it's already captured, and combines them together."


Instead of exposing different pieces of the environment, it underexposes every shot (Levoy claims that the Pixel produces good colors in low light and denoises them well) and makes them pretty with math wizardry.

"Mathematically speaking, take a picture of a shadowed area — it's got the right color, it's just very noisy because not many photons landed in those pixels. But the way the mathematics works, if I take nine shots, the noise will go down by a factor of three — by the square root of the number of shots that I take. And so just taking more shots will make that shot look fine. Maybe it's still dark, maybe I want to boost it with tone mapping, but it won't be noisy. One of the design principles we wanted to adhere to was no.ghosts. ever. Every shot looks the same except for object motion. Nothing is blown out in one shot and not in the other, nothing is noisier in one shot and not in the other. That makes alignment really robust."


i onda komentar dole"

"Instead, Google sought out improvements to their HDR+ processing speed by finding ways to better leverage Qualcomm’s Hexagon DSP, through the use of Qualcomm’s Hexagon Vector eXtensions. Google is offloading substantial portions of processing for HDR+ to the Hexagon DSP that used to be handled by the CPU itself, and that has played a major role in both decreasing the time it takes to process HDR+ shots, and in allowing the Pixel phones to continue shooting HDR+ shots, with DXOMark finding that it could shoot one HDR+ shot every three seconds indefinitely. This pairs very well with the faster shooting capabilities brought about by the Sony Exmor RS IMX378 image sensor to create an exceptional camera."
 
Poslednja izmena:
Kako god oni tumacili fotografisanje i nacin funkcionisanja HDR+ za nas obicne korisnike je bitno samo da fotke budu odlicne(sto ce i biti)
Pa i sad su sa 5X i 6P low light fotke solidne sa HDR+,i ako na Pixelima budu malo bolje to je to,dnevne ne verujem da ce biti mnogo bolje,jer su ionako odlicne.

Послато са D6503 уз помоћ Тапатока
 
Poslednja izmena:
Dobro je sto ne snima kroz staklo [emoji102]

[YOUTUBE]FDqkdsZdsRU[/YOUTUBE]



Sent from my D6503
 
[youtube]6Nv6j6tv2xM[/youtube]

Sent from my Nexus 6P
 
Sa prednje strane dosta podsjeca na iphone, pozadi i sa strane malo lici na htc 10.
Ne znam sto nisu malo bolje dizajnirali prednju stranu, malo je ofucano furati dizajn iz 2007. sa ovolikim bazelima.
 
ARStech. UK review: http://arstechnica.co.uk/gadgets/2016/10/google-pixel-xl-review/

Trajanje baterije (surf @ 200 cd/m2)
High-end-Phone-benchmark.010-640x470.jpeg


U zakljucku testa (the good) pogledajte poslednju tacku [emoji23]

Sa jedinom "the ugly" zamerkom se apsolutno slazem.



Sent from my D6503
 
Dobro da pod bad ili ugly ne stoji da telefoni nisu samsung ili apple

Sent from my Nexus 7 2013 using Tapatalk
 
poznato je da amoledi najvise trose na tim web browsing testovima [pokazuju ubedljivo najore rezultate]. ocekujem da ima oko 15% bolju bateriju nego 5x,sto zbog s821 underklokovanog sto zbog manje dijagonale
 
Ali zašto nisu stavili 6P u tabelu, bitno da ima G4 plus...

Sent from my Nexus 6P
 
Poslednja izmena:
a ima merenja i sa phonearene.


Google Pixel XL / 7h 19 min (Good)
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge / 7h 18 min (Good)
Google Nexus 6P / 6h 24 min (Average)
 
mozda je drljav ali mu bacaju sve na ruke besplatno, jaoooo zeleo bih da napravim ultra wide setup za gejming, lg posalje 3 4k monitora, jaooo graficka mi to ne moze izdrzati nvidia posalje 2x1080, jaooo nigde ne mogu da nadjem glossy iphone 7 apple posalje svaku vrstu i boju, jaooo zeleo bih da probam android google pokloni pixel. I tako svakom ****nom youtjuberu koji ima preko 100k sub, eto vam besplatno zasto da ne naplaticemo mi to sve na obicnim smrtnicima.
 
nista od Pixela u telesmoru. znaci da ga niko nece nabavljati.. daj boze da bude oko 500e na divlje novembra 2017 god..
 
Ma preprodavci kazu da ce biti katastrofa, nije ni cena problem koliko je problem to sto je "google" telefon
 
Status
Zatvorena za pisanje odgovora.
Nazad
Vrh Dno