Pogledajte prilog 133192
ovakav moze ladno u neko slim ili mikro HTPC kuciste...
betlfild i dice svakako favorizuju amd .
![]()
ovakvu razliku u gpu delu , koji bi koristio samo za 2d ( dedicated grafika bi npr. kopala coine) mogu da prihvatim istog momenta.
sa druge strane, graf. razlike u cpu performansama, ne želim ni da postavljam , delovalo bi uvredljivo .
podsećam - kaveri perjanica i i5-4430 koštaju isto .
What Difference Does 50 Watts Make To AMD’s Kaveri?
Desktop Kaveri retains ~80 of its performance if you cut its TDP in half. Compare these findings to the article we did on Trinity’s power scaling and you’ll see that Kaveri offers better performance per watt.
On both the CPU and the GPU side not only does Kaveri out perform Richland at the same TDP but that comparative performance per watt advantage continues to grows as you restrict power consumption to lower levels.
Thus we’ve discovered and confirmed Kaveri’s biggest advantage over Richland, performance per watt.
At the high-end Kaveri doesn’t have a lot to offer non-gamers
In the mean time Kaveri looks like a killer chip for HTPC and small form factor PC applications, plus AMD’s platform costs have been consistently lower than Intel’s for quite sometime. Couple Kaveri with a nice SSD and some good RAM and it will do just about anything you can ask of it and pretty quickly too.
ma, procesor je fin, i malo troši, ali je po performansama iza phenoma 955 i malo bolji od gts 450.
u odnosu na pomenuti i5 , to je jednostavno preskupo . ili npr fx6300 + 7730 , da ne bude posle da sam fanboj ...
E za ovo si u pravu,i to mi nikada nije bilo jasno!!Nije to logika naših derikoža. Oni kada vide da nešto slabo ide podignu cenu još više kako bi nadoknadili na jadniku koji naiđe.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Napomena: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari