Šta je novo?
Od:
Filteri

AMD Radeon Fury X zvanicna tema!

Da li neko ima VBIOS ili neki link do njega?
 
Zadnji info o NANO je da ce mozda biti full chip binovan ali da ce klokovi biti reda ~800Mhz i tako da ce postici manju potrsnju, ali po svemu sudeci cena ce biti paprena! nikao nano :)

I meni je licno jako cudno da imaju dovoljan broj ispravnih cipova za ovaj poduhvat ali ko zna ionako NANO tek treba da izadje
 
Jel do sad prikazan referentni Fury? Bas me zanima za kakav kuler su se opredelili, nije vodeni to sigurno ali ne verujem da ko na Fury Nano.
 
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X and R9 Fury Overclocking And Overvolting

Overclocking has been somewhat of a talking point with AMD’s Fury X graphics card. Mainly because no 3rd party software has been updated to recognize the voltage regulator of the card so far, which is necessary to enable voltage control on Fury X cards. Lack of voltage control meant that the card could not be pushed nearly as far as it can, especially with AMD’s overbuilt powr delivery solution for Fury X and the 500W liquid cooling setup. This has left many users wanting more. Fortunately we’ve heard that an update for Sapphire’s Trixx overclocking software is in the works. And is aimed at solving this exact issue by unlocking voltage control on Fiji based cards, including the Fury X and Fury.
The overclocking guru aka Unwinder who’s responsible for the RivaTuner GPU overclocking software that forms the backbone of almost all 3rd party overclocking tools did not receive a Fury X card at launch.
Which is why we’ve yet to see an update come out yet.

Unwinder :
It is not a question of “strange decision by AMD” at all. It is a question of very limited AMD ADL API. NVIDIA cards simply have unified GPIO/VID based voltage control functions inside NVAPI, so it is very easy and fast to support voltage control on new cards (within driver allowed voltage control range of course) or even provide voltage control for future cards without even seeing them.
It doesn’t apply to AMD. To support voltage control on new cards developers first need to implement low-level I2C aceess support for each new GPI family (which can be troublesome for new GPU architecture), then provide support for each new voltage controller model. That’s not the task that can be done without hardware.

We might see an update that unlocks voltage control pop up just around the time of R9 Fury (vanilla) reviews on the 14th of July, which could be a pleasant surprise.
 
Zato i pitam za VBIOS, da ga vidim u hex-u. :D
 
Sutra izlaze Furije bez X. Vec su pripremljeni neki modeli od Safira i Asusa.

http://wccftech.com/asus-strix-rade...ured-3584-sps-directcu-iii-triple-fan-cooler/

Ocekujem negde oko 5% brzu kartu od GTX 980 u 2k rez i veoma slicne rezultate u HD rezoluciji. Prakticno jednake. U 4k mozda oko 8-10% razlike.
Najvise ce me interesovati overklok i poredjenje sa nereferentnom GTX 980 u istim uslovima, maksimalne mogucnosti obe karte.
 
 
Dark_Messiah je napisao(la):
Sutra izlaze Furije bez X. Vec su pripremljeni neki modeli od Safira i Asusa.

http://wccftech.com/asus-strix-rade...ured-3584-sps-directcu-iii-triple-fan-cooler/

Ocekujem negde oko 5% brzu kartu od GTX 980 u 2k rez i veoma slicne rezultate u HD rezoluciji. Prakticno jednake. U 4k mozda oko 8-10% razlike.
Najvise ce me interesovati overklok i poredjenje sa nereferentnom GTX 980 u istim uslovima, maksimalne mogucnosti obe karte.
Kliknite za proširenje...

ovi 15.7 driveri daju boost na nizim rezolucijama ja mislim da ce i ovaj Fury da bude brzi od GTX980 na FHD dok ce na UHD da je oduva lagano (moje misljenje)
 
Nista cudno, Nvidija nikad nije birala sredstva samo da se proda a ovo sa muvanjem oko image quality to bese bilo jos pre desetak godina kad ih uhvatise da varaju dal bese u 3d marku?
Ko je cesto menjao karte i jednog i drugog proizvodjaca zna da je slika kod AMD-a uvek bila jasnija.
Dok sam bencovao za jedan sajt ovo mi je bila sledeca tema kojom sam hteo da se bavim ali *** nije se stiglo... :)
 
@Miskonius
Jeste kvalitet i jasnoca kao i koloritet slike na AMD je uvek bio daleko bolji..... pogotovo u 2D
 
Erik011 je napisao(la):
http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-r9-f...-launched-4k-ready-performance-beats-980-549/

Inace dokazase ljudi da je sad nvidia smanjuje kvalitet slike i tako postize bolje rezultate. Koga zanima nek uvati thread:
http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?p=1041709168#post1041709168

A evo i fotkica dodatno: http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1041709168&postcount=84
S obzirom da vecina testera ostavi na default control panel, izvucite sami zakljucak :)
Kliknite za proširenje...

Pa to se zna odavno. :D
 
Erik011 je napisao(la):
http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-r9-f...-launched-4k-ready-performance-beats-980-549/

Inace dokazase ljudi da je sad nvidia smanjuje kvalitet slike i tako postize bolje rezultate. Koga zanima nek uvati thread:
http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?p=1041709168#post1041709168

A evo i fotkica dodatno: http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1041709168&postcount=84


S obzirom da vecina testera ostavi na default control panel, izvucite sami zakljucak :)
Kliknite za proširenje...

A možda je samo driver bug u BF-u, inače bi bilo tkavih primera iz većeg broja igara? ;)

Ili je ipak ovo u pitanju:

Dude the guy that made the videos, said it was his mistake that the AF was off, can you stop it now? It was something with his system.
Kliknite za proširenje...

Evo ga:

http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1041717506&postcount=252

As others have not replicated my problem and shown proof, I am happy to say it is a fault at my end. That doesn't help others but the fact remains that I made lots of errors in my early testing and this wasn't good enough (from my perspective) and I should have done better from the off. Sorry again but everything is working "apples to apples" now


I will redo PCars, Batman Arkham Knight and Dirt Rally with everything working correctly. As you can see from the new video's, everything is correct and all settings are the exact same for both set-ups, both on the same system and both on the same monitor. I am using an Avermedia LGP Lite that captures 1080P 30fps (pretty poor I know) but it does the job and no performance hit on either setup.
Kliknite za proširenje...

I još:

http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1041717154&postcount=55

Mada nije čudno što se misko prvi primio na ovaj fud :d
 
Poslednja izmena:
Jedino mi ovo bode oči u testu >>Catalyst 15.15beta<<
 
Polak',bice testa i sa 15.7... :D
 
Eve ovako, http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/zardon/sapphire-tri-x-radeon-r9-fury-4gb/10/,
ova Asus 980 Strix boostuje na oko 1.350Mhz, malo dodati overklok i tesko ce i Furisa da se izbori sa klokovanom 980, pogotovo u HD i 2K, a kamoli ovaj dvojnik.:eyebrows:
A, za ovu moju na kloku od oko 1.580|7950Mhz koja je kao sto vec dobro znate u rangu 980Ti:alo:, necemo ni da pricamo.;)
I opet overklok potencijal tragican, ko da se AMD vratio par godina unazad.

Evo, neki overklok za 980, http://www.vmodtech.com/th/article/amd-radeon-r9-fury-x-4gb-hbm-4096-bit-review/page/27
 
Poslednja izmena:
Ma kakva GTX980 nju i R9 390X sabija, ova karta je klasa iznad mada je i cjena veca tako da dodje koliko para toliko muzike, brze/skuplje.
 
goldi je napisao(la):
Ma kakva GTX980 nju i R9 390X sabija, ova karta je klasa iznad mada je i cjena veca tako da dodje koliko para toliko muzike, brze/skuplje.
Kliknite za proširenje...

Karta koja trosi daleko vise, eno spzila mi 290x pci-e kabal/konektor na seasonic-u, seasonic rekao da za AMD azdaje salje druge kablove.... toliko!
nema OC, 980 je po svemu bolja karta!
 
reviewsrb je napisao(la):
Eve ovako, http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/zardon/sapphire-tri-x-radeon-r9-fury-4gb/10/,
ova Asus 980 Strix boostuje na oko 1.350Mhz, malo dodati overklok i tesko ce i Furisa da se izbori sa klokovanom 980, pogotovo u HD i 2K, a kamoli ovaj dvojnik.:eyebrows:
A, za ovu moju na kloku od oko 1.580|7950Mhz koja je kao sto vec dobro znate u rangu 980Ti:alo:, necemo ni da pricamo.;)
I opet overklok potencijal tragican, ko da se AMD vratio par godina unazad.

Evo, neki overklok za 980, http://www.vmodtech.com/th/article/amd-radeon-r9-fury-x-4gb-hbm-4096-bit-review/page/27
Kliknite za proširenje...

Pa zar se do sada nije potenciralo na tome,kako je najvazniji min fps?
 
zeljko je napisao(la):
Karta koja trosi daleko vise, eno spzila mi 290x pci-e kabal/konektor na seasonic-u, seasonic rekao da za AMD azdaje salje druge kablove.... toliko!
nema OC, 980 je po svemu bolja karta!
Kliknite za proširenje...

Malo bolja puno skuplja sve na isto koliko para toliko muzike.
 
Klokovana R9 290 stiže stock 980 u Firestriku, zašto ne bi Fury bio brzi.
 
Koliko Firestrike ima veze sa ((ne)optimizovanim) igrama? :D
 
Ja samo kazem, da sto se tiče snage Havajanac ne manjka. Witcher 3 sa svim popaljenim sem hairworks izvlači solidnih 50-60 FPS u 1080p. Ne pada ispod 40FPS.
 
I na TPU review manjeg Asus Fury-ja.

- Kartica troši 200W
- Dual slot hladnjak, maksimalna temperatura 68C (ko je rekao ne može da se hladi Fury vazduhom)
- Performanse u 1080P kao GTX980 i što je veća rezolucija Fury odmiče sve više (u 4K oko 15%)
- Overklok i dalje ograničen kao i kod X modela (oko 10%)
- Skuplja od glavnog konkurenta
 
Morate se prijaviti ili registrovati da odgovorite ovde.
Nazad
Vrh Dno