pa mislim da i on govori o beti, ma javice sam pa ce ti odgovoritiAli on postavlja pitanje da li ima smisla koristiti v3 a ne v3 Beta. Bete ništa ne znače. n puta, lično sam se uverio, da se bete mnogo razlikuju od finalne verzije.
Ali on postavlja pitanje da li ima smisla koristiti v3 a ne v3 Beta. Bete ništa ne znače. n puta, lično sam se uverio, da se bete mnogo razlikuju od finalne verzije.
Ali on postavlja pitanje da li ima smisla koristiti v3 a ne v3 Beta. Bete ništa ne znače. n puta, lično sam se uverio, da se bete mnogo razlikuju od finalne verzije.
This is interesting. Initially it seemed that Firefox 3.0 beta 1 was consuming more memory than 2.0.0.9, but during the twelve page test I started seeing what I’ve been seeing before - spiraling memory consumption when the browser is under significant load. I’m certain that if the browser had been left open longer, memory usage would have continued to rise. I didn’t see much signs of Firefox 3.0 beta 1 doing this. Certainly based on this test and from using Firefox 3.0 beta 1 today, I do think that things have significantly improved....
Last night I downloaded the latest beta release from Mozilla, Firefox 3 Beta 1, meaning to just have a look-see so that I could pen a few impressions. Since then, I haven't bothered to load up Firefox 2 because, even though it's a pre-production test version, Firebox 3 Beta 1 is a mighty fine browser.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Napomena: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari