- Učlanjen(a)
- 13.12.2011
- Poruke
- 195
- Poena
- 169
Uzimam 2500k i uzecu plocu za 6870 CF. Planiram lepo da kloknem taj 2500k. Imam opciju da uzmem jeftino, za nekih 90e, Asus P8P67 plocu, koliko vidim ima dobru naponsku ali ima jedan pcie x16, dok drugi u CF radi na x4. Da li bi mi to mnogo ubilo performanse? Negde sam citao da je razlika mala, a drugi mi kazu da ima razlike. Druga alternativa mi je da uzmem GA-P67A-UD3P-B3, koja ima jedan x? Pritom za 14000 ili 15000 mogu da dobijem asusovu plocu i Cooler Master V10, dakle uz doplatu od 1000 ili dve u odnosu na Gigabyte. Ako uzmem Gigabyte, moram da doplatim jos bar 4000 a neki Noctua kvalitetan kuler. Pomagajte.
Ovo kazu:
It seems with x4/x4 there were more drops in performance than x16/x16. The game was still more than playable though, even with those drops, but it is at least interesting that they show up there in x4/x4.
Dakle minimum fps je manji na x4 nego na x16, ali ovo je bas ogromna rezolucija, tako da ne znam kako bi se to odrazilo na 1920x1080 na kojoj ja igram.
Ovo je zakljucak tog teksta:
The results are actually a bit shocking to us to be honest. We weren’t so surprised that in the previous evaluation x8/x8 did not cause any differences at 2560x1600 but did at 5760x1200. However, we thought certainly at x4/x4 PCIe 2.0 mode there would be some kind of a bottleneck at 2560x1600, but the results have proven otherwise. Even with all the data that GTX 480 SLI is pushing across the PCIe bus, x4/x4 is NOT a bottleneck in a single display setup at 2560x1600 with AA enabled. The only game to show us any difference was AvP, but it did not affect the gameplay experience. Therefore, if you are on an aging PCIe 1.X system at x8/x8 mode (equivalent to PCIe 2.0 x4/x4) on a single display fear not, you are not holding back the performance of GTX 480 SLI or we guess with any CrossFireX or SLI configuration.
Ovo kazu:
It seems with x4/x4 there were more drops in performance than x16/x16. The game was still more than playable though, even with those drops, but it is at least interesting that they show up there in x4/x4.
Dakle minimum fps je manji na x4 nego na x16, ali ovo je bas ogromna rezolucija, tako da ne znam kako bi se to odrazilo na 1920x1080 na kojoj ja igram.
Ovo je zakljucak tog teksta:
The results are actually a bit shocking to us to be honest. We weren’t so surprised that in the previous evaluation x8/x8 did not cause any differences at 2560x1600 but did at 5760x1200. However, we thought certainly at x4/x4 PCIe 2.0 mode there would be some kind of a bottleneck at 2560x1600, but the results have proven otherwise. Even with all the data that GTX 480 SLI is pushing across the PCIe bus, x4/x4 is NOT a bottleneck in a single display setup at 2560x1600 with AA enabled. The only game to show us any difference was AvP, but it did not affect the gameplay experience. Therefore, if you are on an aging PCIe 1.X system at x8/x8 mode (equivalent to PCIe 2.0 x4/x4) on a single display fear not, you are not holding back the performance of GTX 480 SLI or we guess with any CrossFireX or SLI configuration.
