Šta je novo?
Od:
Filteri

Crysis Benchmark CPU/GPU [HIGH]

ajmo ljudi, sta ste se stisli?
dajte neke proseke fps u dx10 u 1280 ili 1600 wide(moze i standard)? 8800 je dx10? ovde sve sami dx9 testovi pa ne mogu nista da zakljucim posto i ja ocu upgrade uskoro, pa ako dajem 200+ evra za gpu kontam da je ok da radi u dx10 u 1280 makar 30+ fps :whip:
 
Poslednja izmena:
@GoranM: Sto je niza rezolucija to je veci udeo procesora. Zato je 3dmark cpu test 640x480. Skoro sam siguran da nece rasti performanse linearno. Verovatno mu je 2400 jednostavno premalo MHz, cpu bottleneck, pa otuda tolika razlika. Ako mozes probaj da povecas takt a ne da obaras. Ovo povecanje sa 3400 na 3600 je oko 6% i 3d mark cpu score je veci za 6% (sa 2964 na 3128) a SM2 je sa 6029 skocio na 6260. Crysis CPU benchmark se nije promenio, a ne znam sta mi bi da ne probam GPU.

@djape1: imas drugi tred za 1680x1050 a dx10 ne radi pod XPom
 
Poslednja izmena:
OK u 1280 razlika se svela na cca 0.25fps Nije skoro nikakva. Pitanje je da li vlasnici 8800GT koji iamju 43fps na E4300 na 3Ghz imaju zaostatak u odnosu na E6750 na 3600MHz. Moguce je da kada karta ima snage u nekoj rez. procesor pocinje da igra ulogu. OK toliko od mene. Preko vikenda sam u NS. flashujemo Anubisov 3850. Javljamo se sa rezultatima. Nadam se na nekom E6750 na 3.5GHz.

P.S. Leva je sa 2400Mhz, desna sa 3060Mhz
 

Prilozi

  • 1280_cpu_2406_vga_770_2000.JPG
    1280_cpu_2406_vga_770_2000.JPG
    66.7 KB · Pregleda: 87
  • 1280_cpu_3060_vga_770_2000.JPG
    1280_cpu_3060_vga_770_2000.JPG
    66.5 KB · Pregleda: 91
Poslednja izmena:
djape1 je napisao(la):
ajmo ljudi, sta ste se stisli?
dajte neke proseke fps u dx10 u 1280 ili 1600 wide(moze i standard)? 8800 je dx10? ovde sve sami dx9 testovi pa ne mogu nista da zakljucim posto i ja ocu upgrade uskoro, pa ako dajem 200+ evra za gpu kontam da je ok da radi u dx10 u 1280 makar 30+ fps :whip:
Kliknite za proširenje...

Oces zakljucak. Trenutno na planeti (osim u NVidijinim razvojnim laboratorijama) ne postoji grafika koja omogucava ugodno igranje Crysis-a u 1650x1080 u DX10. U DX9 da, ali u DX10 ne. Ima onaj tweak koji "vara", pa DX9 izgleda kao DX10. E ako ti je to OK, onda trk po 8800GTX ili ultru, pa na igranje. naravno ako ti fps padne na 25 nemoj ocajavati. Sretno! :wave:
 
djape1 je napisao(la):
ajmo ljudi, sta ste se stisli?
dajte neke proseke fps u dx10 u 1280 ili 1600 wide(moze i standard)? 8800 je dx10? ovde sve sami dx9 testovi pa ne mogu nista da zakljucim posto i ja ocu upgrade uskoro, pa ako dajem 200+ evra za gpu kontam da je ok da radi u dx10 u 1280 makar 30+ fps :whip:
Kliknite za proširenje...

igraj ti slobodno na dx10 samo ne ocekuj vise od 15fps. Ako oces DX10, cekaj 9*** seriju.
 
Poslednja izmena:
jel to znaci da i posle 1g od predstavljanja 1. dx10 gpu i sijaset ostalih varijacija i dalje ne mogu se teraju dx10 igre u 1280? pa za crysis smo znali jos pre god dana sta ce predstavljati ali i dalje posle toliko vremena proizvodjaci nisu u stanju da izbace graficke koje to mogu isterati u 30fps? pa sta to znaci da svi koji su kupili gpu za 200+ evra morace opet kupovati nove na prolece kad izlaze nove igre dx10 kako bi uzivali u carima dx10 doduse ako i bude podrske za dx9? ne secam se da je ikada bio toliki jaz izmedju igara i grafickih kartica a sve mi je jasnije da je ipak to posledica monopola nvidie jer trenutno ne postoji konkurencija
 
Evo sa dx10 tweakom pod XP-om. Sve stavljeno na very high. Sasvim igriv fps a neuporedivo lepse.



12/14/2007 7:44:05 PM - XP
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_cpu
DX9 1280x1024, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 1500, Recorded Time: 44.62s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 50.78s, Average FPS: 29.54
Min FPS: 19.68 at frame 208, Max FPS: 41.02 at frame 116
Average Tri/Sec: 40970600, Tri/Frame: 1387065
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.52
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 47.73s, Average FPS: 31.43
Min FPS: 19.68 at frame 208, Max FPS: 41.02 at frame 116
Average Tri/Sec: 43694612, Tri/Frame: 1390390
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.52
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 47.17s, Average FPS: 31.80
Min FPS: 19.68 at frame 208, Max FPS: 41.02 at frame 116
Average Tri/Sec: 43917568, Tri/Frame: 1381084
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.52
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

12/14/2007 7:44:05 PM - XP

Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 31.615





12/14/2007 7:48:06 PM - XP
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1280x1024, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 60.88s, Average FPS: 32.85
Min FPS: 20.60 at frame 158, Max FPS: 39.41 at frame 967
Average Tri/Sec: -25083256, Tri/Frame: -763490
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.20
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 57.03s, Average FPS: 35.07
Min FPS: 20.60 at frame 158, Max FPS: 40.59 at frame 982
Average Tri/Sec: -26620758, Tri/Frame: -759082
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.21
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 57.01s, Average FPS: 35.08
Min FPS: 20.60 at frame 158, Max FPS: 41.23 at frame 1010
Average Tri/Sec: -26586994, Tri/Frame: -757827
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.21
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

12/14/2007 7:48:06 PM - XP

Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 35.075
 
djape1 je napisao(la):
jel to znaci da i posle 1g od predstavljanja 1. dx10 gpu i sijaset ostalih varijacija i dalje ne mogu se teraju dx10 igre u 1280? pa za crysis smo znali jos pre god dana sta ce predstavljati ali i dalje posle toliko vremena proizvodjaci nisu u stanju da izbace graficke koje to mogu isterati u 30fps? pa sta to znaci da svi koji su kupili gpu za 200+ evra morace opet kupovati nove na prolece kad izlaze nove igre dx10 kako bi uzivali u carima dx10 doduse ako i bude podrske za dx9? ne secam se da je ikada bio toliki jaz izmedju igara i grafickih kartica a sve mi je jasnije da je ipak to posledica monopola nvidie jer trenutno ne postoji konkurencija
Kliknite za proširenje...


crysis ne moze, za ostale ne znam
 
Prelazak sa Asus7950GT na Gigabyte8800GT

Evo i mojih rezultata GPU benchmarka. CPU je [email protected], XPSP2, sve na HIGH, no AA, rezolucija 1280x1024

7950GT@550/700:
Play Time: 155.07s, Average FPS: 12.90
Min FPS: 7.23 at frame 137, Max FPS: 16.53 at frame 1011
7950GT@650/800:
Play Time: 137.16s, Average FPS: 14.58
Min FPS: 7.85 at frame 145, Max FPS: 18.32 at frame 990
8800GT@600/900:
Play Time: 51.34s, Average FPS: 38.96
Min FPS: 20.75 at frame 140, Max FPS: 47.18 at frame 1005
8800GT@700/1050:
Play Time: 44.91s, Average FPS: 44.55
Min FPS: 17.64 at frame 152, Max FPS: 54.36 at frame 1008
 
Windows XP 32bit
C2D E6550@2333Mhz OC na 3150Mhz
Gainward Bliss 8800 GT 512 mb OC na 700/1750/1025

Sve na High , bez AA

12/15/2007 8:46:10 PM - XP
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1680x1050, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 87.66s, Average FPS: 22.82
Min FPS: 13.84 at frame 137, Max FPS: 40.24 at frame 986
Average Tri/Sec: -22300178, Tri/Frame: -977428
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.94
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 57.43s, Average FPS: 34.83
Min FPS: 13.84 at frame 137, Max FPS: 40.24 at frame 986
Average Tri/Sec: -33600108, Tri/Frame: -964745
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.95
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 57.39s, Average FPS: 34.85
Min FPS: 13.84 at frame 137, Max FPS: 40.58 at frame 987
Average Tri/Sec: -33629416, Tri/Frame: -965010
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.95
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

12/15/2007 8:46:10 PM - XP

Run #1- DX9 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 34.84
 
ista sad jel cemo citati izmedu redova ,malo li je razlika izmedu gt i gts 512
znate i sami koja je razlika u 14 i 22 fps-a kada igrate igru
 
Postujte obavezno i cpu bench jer daje realnu sliku o fps u igri.
 
^ Zanimljivo da ti je min FPS manji sa većim klokom 8800GT-a. :trust:
 
Poslednja izmena:
Ne znam zašto, ali tako je bilo na sva 4 'prolaza', mislim da FPS na tom mestu ne zavisi samo od brzine GPU...

TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 50.06s, Average FPS: 39.95
Min FPS: 17.64 at frame 152, Max FPS: 50.83 at frame 977
Average Tri/Sec: 40402612, Tri/Frame: 1011295
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.91
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 44.89s, Average FPS: 44.55
Min FPS: 17.64 at frame 152, Max FPS: 53.30 at frame 1015
Average Tri/Sec: 45520448, Tri/Frame: 1021796
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.90
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 44.90s, Average FPS: 44.54
Min FPS: 17.64 at frame 152, Max FPS: 53.30 at frame 1015
Average Tri/Sec: 45566040, Tri/Frame: 1022964
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.90
!TimeDemo Run 3 Finished.
Play Time: 44.91s, Average FPS: 44.55
Min FPS: 17.64 at frame 152, Max FPS: 54.36 at frame 1008
Average Tri/Sec: 45534644, Tri/Frame: 1022390
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.90
TimeDemo Play Ended, (4 Runs Performed)
 
Poslednja izmena:
Ma taj minimalni fps nije precizan, to je vec svima postalo jasno. Dosta se kompenzuje triple buffer-om.
 
Koliko sam primetio, Min. fps je dosta veci ako se pokrene isti benchmark vise puta za redom (dovoljno je provrteti test dva ili tri puta), nekad razlika ume da bude i do 5 frejmova! A Max. fps dosta zavisi od brzine CPU-a, mada nista od ovog ne utice specijalno na Avg. fps.
 
BOX85 je napisao(la):
Koliko sam primetio, Min. fps je dosta veci ako se pokrene isti benchmark vise puta za redom (dovoljno je provrteti test dva ili tri puta), nekad razlika ume da bude i do 5 frejmova! A Max. fps dosta zavisi od brzine CPU-a, mada nista od ovog ne utice specijalno na Avg. fps.
Kliknite za proširenje...

da, uvek je zadnji prolaz najbrzi. Inace triple buffer pomaze da se on podigne.
 
GoranM je napisao(la):
Inace triple buffer pomaze da se on podigne.
Kliknite za proširenje...

Pravo da ti kazem, mislim da pomaze samo kada se prvi put pokrene test, vec u drugom ili trecem obrtanju, postaje sve jedno jel opcija ukljucena ili iskljucena.
Probao sam, i tako se ponasa kod mene, znaci skoro da nema neke bitne razlike.
 
Uradio sam ponovo GPU benchmark - sada sa overklokovanim E6700 na 3.6GHz i average FPS se popravio sa 44.55 na 44.75, znači uopšte ne zavisi od CPU snage - što je i logično jer je u GPU benchmarku sve statično.

Onda sam se bacio na CPU benchmark:

8800GT@700/1050 [email protected]:

Play Time: 37.32s, Average FPS: 40.19
Min FPS: 17.05 at frame 196, Max FPS: 49.68 at frame 98


8800GT@700/1050 [email protected]:

Play Time: 37.07s, Average FPS: 40.47
Min FPS: 14.99 at frame 210, Max FPS: 51.27 at frame 99

Znači, i ovde CPU snaga utiče minimalno, dovoljni su i slabiji Core2Duo procesori, da ne pominjem quad core koji je verovatno čisto bacanje para (bilo bi zanimljivo videti rezultate quad-core na 2.66GHz)
 
C2D [email protected], Gainward 8800GT@720/1050

20-Dec-07 16:16:02 - XP
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1280x1024, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 48.60s, Average FPS: 41.15
Min FPS: 18.98 at frame 153, Max FPS: 52.69 at frame 1009
Average Tri/Sec: 40709812, Tri/Frame: 989230
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.93
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 43.30s, Average FPS: 46.19
Min FPS: 18.98 at frame 153, Max FPS: 53.33 at frame 1024
Average Tri/Sec: 46221468, Tri/Frame: 1000632
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.92
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 43.20s, Average FPS: 46.30
Min FPS: 18.98 at frame 153, Max FPS: 53.33 at frame 1024
Average Tri/Sec: 46374076, Tri/Frame: 1001652
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.92
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

20-Dec-07 16:16:02 - XP

Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 46.245
 
Athlon 64 X2 4000+, Biostar 8600GTS 256MB

12/22/2007 15:07:45 - XP
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1280x1024, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 354.38s, Average FPS: 5.64
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 137, Max FPS: 15.39 at frame 857
Average Tri/Sec: 5536028, Tri/Frame: 980930
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.93
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 150.89s, Average FPS: 13.25
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 137, Max FPS: 15.48 at frame 1770
Average Tri/Sec: 13136975, Tri/Frame: 991117
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.92
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 149.64s, Average FPS: 13.37
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 137, Max FPS: 15.48 at frame 1770
Average Tri/Sec: 13249949, Tri/Frame: 991390
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.92
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

12/22/2007 15:07:45 - XP

Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 13.31

Nije bas za pohvalu :(
Inace presao sam igru na 1024x768 na medium podesavanjima bez problema, na 1280x1024 medium bilo je neprijatnih usporenja ali igrivo koliko toliko.
 
Min fps 0, :d mislim bas je minimalan :type:.
Dobro da nije otisao u minus :p.
 
PentiumE 2160@3GHz
Radeon 2600pro@m/c: 756/801
no AA, no AF
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 235.11s, Average FPS: 8.51
Min FPS: 4.51 at frame 1660, Max FPS: 9.93 at frame 72
Average Tri/Sec: -8020790, Tri/Frame: -942902
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.97
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 222.69s, Average FPS: 8.98
Min FPS: 0.89 at frame 1694, Max FPS: 10.15 at frame 978
Average Tri/Sec: -8363923, Tri/Frame: -931283
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.98
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 222.03s, Average FPS: 9.01
Min FPS: 0.89 at frame 1694, Max FPS: 10.24 at frame 981
Average Tri/Sec: -8376192, Tri/Frame: -929881
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.99
!TimeDemo Run 3 Finished.
Play Time: 222.35s, Average FPS: 8.99
Min FPS: 0.89 at frame 1694, Max FPS: 10.24 at frame 981
Average Tri/Sec: -8371781, Tri/Frame: -930728
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.98
TimeDemo Play Ended, (4 Runs Performed)
Kliknite za proširenje...
 
Poslednja izmena:
clokovi 700/1750/2100mhz
DX9 1280x1024, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=2, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
GPU
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 57.65s, Average FPS: 34.69
Min FPS: 17.32 at frame 138, Max FPS: 52.75 at frame 983
Average Tri/Sec: 34172524, Tri/Frame: 985069
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.93
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 49.12s, Average FPS: 40.72
Min FPS: 17.32 at frame 138, Max FPS: 54.47 at frame 993
Average Tri/Sec: 40519576, Tri/Frame: 995123
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.92
TimeDemo Play Ended, (2 Runs Performed)

CPU
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 1500, Recorded Time: 44.62s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 44.57s, Average FPS: 33.65
Min FPS: 17.67 at frame 196, Max FPS: 51.51 at frame 124
Average Tri/Sec: 32895102, Tri/Frame: 977504
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.74
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 38.25s, Average FPS: 39.22
Min FPS: 17.67 at frame 196, Max FPS: 51.51 at frame 124
Average Tri/Sec: 38396492, Tri/Frame: 979114
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.73
TimeDemo Play Ended, (2 Runs Performed)
 
Poslednja izmena:
Lanselot je napisao(la):
pardon, memorija je 2200mhz ,)
Kliknite za proširenje...

Ajde ti igraj Crysis jedno 2 sata na tih 2200MHz, pa ako ne blokira onda se hvali ,).
3DMark06 ili Crysis benchmark ako prolazi, to ne znaci da je graficka stabilan na tim klokovima.


Ja sam moj GTS 320MB nagurao na 660/1600/975MHz i normalno je prosao vise puta 3DMark06 i Crysis test (sa tim klokovima sam imao avg fps 37), ali se onda zamrznuo u nekoj igri, pa sam vratio na 650/1512/950 (i to joj je dovoljan klok: 27%/27%/20%) :type:.
A sa ovim klokovima imam avg fps 35.
 
Poslednja izmena:
Cackao sam malo ovaj crysis benchmark. Kad se spusti fizika na low dobije se dragocena 3-4 frejma vise u cpu testu. U samoj igri moze se moze dobiti i vise od ovoga kad je neka pucnjava u pitanju.
 
Ma lepo je to, ali sa fizikom na low neke stvari se prosto ne događaju kako treba u vezi sa samim gameplay-em.
 
Procitao sam u tweak guide-u i na jos par mesta sa pedigreom da fizika treba da bude minimalno na high, da bi sve funkcionisalo kao sto je zamisljeno.
 
Morate se prijaviti ili registrovati da odgovorite ovde.
Nazad
Vrh Dno