filipp
Čuven
- Učlanjen(a)
- 15.03.2003
- Poruke
- 847
- Poena
- 619
Ali utorent jeste.
Car!!
Ali utorent jeste.
Finally, we get to the part of the review everyone wants to know about: performance. Crytek claims that Warhead is better optimized than Crysis, and everything I experienced confirms this. In fact, what's amazing is that Warhead not only runs better than Crysis, it looks better than Crysis. Keep in mind, a year has passed since Crysis shipped and there still isn't a non-Crytek game that approaches it in terms of visuals. Warhead features more definition to the terrain, and the lighting and particle effects have gotten big boosts. I found myself walking through jungle with the morning light piercing the canopy and had to stop and just absorb the moment. It had a level of atmosphere that I can't recall from the first game.
The dark clouds portend trouble. And so does the freeze beam.
I played Warhead on a high-end machine with a quad core CPU and the latest Nvidia graphics card at high resolution (1680x1050) with all the details set to Enthusiast, which is essentially very high. It looked cutting edge and the frame rate was solid. Next, I checked the game on a slightly older PC with a two-year old 8800GTS and I was still able to crank it to Enthusiast settings and the same resolution and get solid results. Finally, I checked it out on the "$700 PC" that Crytek and EA have been touting. It really is a $700 machine built on the latest mainstream parts (the video card is a 9800GT), and I was able to play the final boss battle at the same resolution and at Enthusiast settings and get solid frame rates. I also tried it the Gamer setting, which is essentially high, and the frame rate was buttery smooth. You do lose some visual quality stepping down from Enthusiast, but even at Gamer Warhead still looks better than almost every game out
Ocena 94/100, sve u svemu biće ovo još jedno zanimljivo iskustvo![]()
Realno, igraci uvek daju najrealniju ocenu o igri!
Apsolutno se slažem, ali za to ćemo morati da sačekamo 19. septembar![]()
ut of course, this being Crysis, a single question remains. Will your hardware allow you to play the game this time around? Will it run on anything less powerful than the WOPR from WarGames? This issue has possibly been slightly over-stated, as a significant chunk of the PC audience were actually perfectly capable of running the original Crysis on some manner of settings the first time out. The difference here is that the game has been optimised for a lower spec machine, and a slightly sheepish Crytek have made it clear that they sounded off on the tech-melting requirements of the first game a little too loudly last year. The official specs for Warhead are:
The nano-suit may be a lovely piece of kit, but if I had to dress up like that to enjoy its capabilities, I'd probably rather risk a bullet in the pancreas instead.
OS: Windows Vista / XP with SP2;
Processor: 3.2 GHz for Vista 2.8 GHz for XP;
Memory: 1.5 GB for Vista 1.0 GB for XP;
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT or greater; ATI Radeon 9800 Pro (Radeon X800 Pro for Vista ) or greater.
To put that in context, Crytek has built a machine from online parts capable of running Warhead on the second-highest graphics settings for USD 600.
To end on a tenuous analogy, Crysis Warhead is probably the Back to the Future II of videogames: rather than totally transform the story and setting, it returns to the original narrative, exploring it from a different angle; once again, the results are sharper, meaner, and have a lot more for you to think about (although, thankfully, there are no dodgy CGI sharks or Elisabeth Shue performances). The original Crysis may have given you the basic tools, but Warhead allows you to really use them, and while its previous titles made it clear that Crytek knew technology like few others, it's this strange off-shoot Warhead that proves it's no slouch when it comes to level design and set-pieces either.
Mislis 12. septembar.![]()
Ili sam ga platio 2500 ili 3000 manje nije bilo sigurno, a sad im na sajtu stoji 799???^Crysis i ne kosta toliko, jeftiniji je, i to bas u toj radnji![]()
Naravno da nisu.I onda EA games nisu OK![]()
I onda EA games nisu OK![]()
OK su im cene ali reflektuju kvalitet njihovih naslova..![]()
Hmda, a gledam bas cenovnik i vidim ove od 5999 dindzi, verovatno sve vrcaju od kvaliteta :smoke:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Napomena: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari