Reality, or the truth of a matter under consideration, has no bearing on niceties, diplomacy, relationship or any form of attachment. Truth is merely what it is. Everyone knows that, so why should there be some form of bonding and then argue over disagreements? Bondage is about complementing, not distancing. Sure, forums like these are good points of contact for the marketing department but if you are only interested in the truth and you’ve got your methodologies pegged, then there should be NO synergistic contact…. but what if you cannot afford to be truly independent? Accept it then that you are a mere pimp no matter how distant you want that labelling to be veiled.
Attachements or relationships are about trust and trust is when you have 101% faith - when you’ve relinquished ALL claims to the final consequence of that relationship. When I am spending my money, I am not interested in anybody’s attachment to the seller when voicing his opinion on my purchase. There isn’t one person who does not comprehend the reality of testing ex-gratias. It’s loaded in some way. There is only a little area for a clean slate should competency be in charge [and should idiocy-cum-lunacy be guiding the show, we bemused over those 101 “lab tests” using “barely breathing” componentry – the whole review then is about death and little else].
So, what about the truly honest and skillful offering to test ex-gratia products with 101% detachment? Sincerity then is not the word, manipulation and justification is. There is no such thing as detached attachment or vice-versa. Confidence do not depend on others when you are truthful. Seeking acceptance is seeking attachment. One aspect which eludes most is that life is not so much about what they’ve done but what they’ve become. That which is real happens within whereas rationalities is ALL about what’s without. Non-compliance/detachment is not rudeness when you are after the truth. In almost all instances, seeking acceptance [as opposed to advice or opinion] is about trading, not independence.
There is no such thing as trust in relationships. There is only fairplay. Trust is when you are fully detached [and not indifferent] otherwise, it is merely blind faith. Which dog bites the hand that feeds it? A rabid one according to its handler, the source of goodies – the path for one’s vested interests. Those who has a deep sense of sincerity should achieve their position through full independence or else accept that you are merely a cog in “their” wheel. Without exception, regardless of the justifications. The hallmarks of Thermalright’s beancounter/s are stamped over EVERY one of their product that I’ve regrettably bought and used and that can ONLY be achieved when “worship” is the theme. People seldom realise that there is no way of predicting utility other than to become a victim or a satisfactant. This is why corruption-of-sorts is so virulent and fashion [of any kind] is just another word for corruption.
