Izgled Longhorna
- Začetnik teme bibby
- Datum pokretanja
- Učlanjen(a)
- 30.07.2000
- Poruke
- 5,577
- Poena
- 770
Citat odatle, koji objasnjava sta ce nam to novo Longhorn ponuditi:
"Longhorn will deliver on a concept called Life Immersion, which will "embrace human factors like [Microsoft has] never done before, to really understand how to make that emotional connection to [its] customers to address all of the product requirements that I talked about, making it just work, making it something that you can invite and live with every day in new and profound ways from a technological perspective both at the hardware and with the software to deliver that immersive experience."
Jedva cekam da uspostavim "emotional connection" sa njim :d
"Longhorn will deliver on a concept called Life Immersion, which will "embrace human factors like [Microsoft has] never done before, to really understand how to make that emotional connection to [its] customers to address all of the product requirements that I talked about, making it just work, making it something that you can invite and live with every day in new and profound ways from a technological perspective both at the hardware and with the software to deliver that immersive experience."
Jedva cekam da uspostavim "emotional connection" sa njim :d
DeanXP
Čuven
- Učlanjen(a)
- 07.03.2003
- Poruke
- 412
- Poena
- 619
E ovaj Aero UI vec lici na nesto.
Nego izgleda da ce Longhorn biti strasno zahtevan kad ga pokrecu na Xeon 80GHz i 20GB RAM ;P Interesantan detalj sa ovog shota :mrgreen: :
http://www.winsupersite.com/images/showcase/lh-winhec-03.png (ispod Marieke's PC).
Samo jedna mala ispravka: Longhorn bi trebao da se pojavi pocetkom 2005 a ne krajem.
Nego izgleda da ce Longhorn biti strasno zahtevan kad ga pokrecu na Xeon 80GHz i 20GB RAM ;P Interesantan detalj sa ovog shota :mrgreen: :
http://www.winsupersite.com/images/showcase/lh-winhec-03.png (ispod Marieke's PC).
Samo jedna mala ispravka: Longhorn bi trebao da se pojavi pocetkom 2005 a ne krajem.
- Učlanjen(a)
- 30.07.2000
- Poruke
- 5,577
- Poena
- 770
Sumnjam da su i ovo screenshotovi GUI-ja koji radi, jer jos nije stigao ni do beta verzije, nego je vecina slika nacrtana kao koncept (ne sve, ali vecina). Mislim, to nije nista lose i to rade sve firme sa svojim proizvodima - prvo dizajneri nacrtaju, pa programeri pokusavaju to da ostvare. Mada se meni licno ne dopada GUI dizajn u kojem mi sve izgleda kao da se OS pusta iz Media Playera...
To jest, prvo su imali svoj zaseban shell, pa su integrisali shell sa internet explorerom, a sada mi izleda kao da integrisu shell sa media playerom
To jest, prvo su imali svoj zaseban shell, pa su integrisali shell sa internet explorerom, a sada mi izleda kao da integrisu shell sa media playerom
cyberdude je napisao(la):da i ja sam čuo početkom 2005. a ne krajem.
predpostavljam da će izaći krajem 2004.
znate kakav je m$ (samo da uzmu pare na brzaka i puste bugovit o$ na tržište
Nema sanse, pazi kad ce XP SP2 izaci sredinom sledece godine!
Longhorn ce se u najboljem slucaju pojaviti krajem 2005.
- Učlanjen(a)
- 08.03.2003
- Poruke
- 6,789
- Poena
- 1,065
Moja oprema
- CPU & Cooler
- Ryzen 5 5600X
- Matična ploča
- Asus Prime B350-Plus
- RAM
- 16GB Corsair DDR4 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16
- GPU
- Sapphire Pure Radeon 9060 XT 16GB
- Storage
- XPG Gammix S11 Pro 1TB
- PSU
- Seasonic 520W 12Mii
- Monitor
- BenQ VZ2770 27"
- Miš & tastatura
- Motospeed Ck104, ProtoArc EM03
- Mobilni telefon
- Poco F5
- Pristup internetu
- Optički internet
vec sad ima neka beta
Evo i potvrde:
"Late last week, Microsoft posted an interesting document outlining its release plans for various Windows version service packs, prompting reports that Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2), originally due late this year, was being delayed until late 2004. That's because the page lists "Q3 2004" as the XP SP2 release date. A little fact checking goes a long way, however, and after conferring with various Microsoft representatives, I've confirmed that the Q3 2004 date is, indeed a typo. That's the good news. The bad news is that the service pack is still shipping a lot later than originally expected: It won't be out until the first half of 2004.
"Unfortunately, that Web site is incorrect," a Microsoft representative told me Monday. "Windows XP Service Pack 2 will actually ship by mid-2004, and we announced this date at the annual Financial Analysts Meeting last month." Indeed, Microsoft group vice president Jim Allchin noted that SP2 would ship by mid-2004 at the meeting. "We have Service Pack 2 for Windows XP coming out this fiscal year," he said. "[It will] not [include new] features, but there will be a few things that we're adding to that." Because Microsoft's fiscal year runs from July 1, 2003 to June 30, 2003, "fiscal 2004" refers to that time frame and not calendar year 2004. That schedule, I was told, is still correct."
"Late last week, Microsoft posted an interesting document outlining its release plans for various Windows version service packs, prompting reports that Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2), originally due late this year, was being delayed until late 2004. That's because the page lists "Q3 2004" as the XP SP2 release date. A little fact checking goes a long way, however, and after conferring with various Microsoft representatives, I've confirmed that the Q3 2004 date is, indeed a typo. That's the good news. The bad news is that the service pack is still shipping a lot later than originally expected: It won't be out until the first half of 2004.
"Unfortunately, that Web site is incorrect," a Microsoft representative told me Monday. "Windows XP Service Pack 2 will actually ship by mid-2004, and we announced this date at the annual Financial Analysts Meeting last month." Indeed, Microsoft group vice president Jim Allchin noted that SP2 would ship by mid-2004 at the meeting. "We have Service Pack 2 for Windows XP coming out this fiscal year," he said. "[It will] not [include new] features, but there will be a few things that we're adding to that." Because Microsoft's fiscal year runs from July 1, 2003 to June 30, 2003, "fiscal 2004" refers to that time frame and not calendar year 2004. That schedule, I was told, is still correct."
