Šta je novo?
Od:
Filteri

COICA - o cemu se tu radi?

DukeLander

DukeLander

Administrator
Administrator
Učlanjen(a)
03.11.2008
Poruke
12,934
Poena
1,205
Danas sam naleteo na netu na ovu informaciju.

COICA

In the United States, a new law proposal called The Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA) was introduced last week, and there will be a hearing in front of the Judiciary Committee this Thursday.

If passed, this law will allow the government, under the command of the media companies, to censor the internet as they see fit, like China and Iran do, with the difference that the sites they decide to censor will be completely removed from the internet and not just in the US.




O cemu se tu konkretno radi,ako neko moze da nas prosvetli?
 
pa cenzura interneta u USA kao u Kini i Iranu
sta je tu cudno?
 
Zato sto US kontrolise sve top level domene.
 
.com nije americki domen
 
Nije, ali koliko sam citao u teksu, sa ovim ce moci da blokiraju .com domene.
 
pa ne smeju, to je intenacionalni domen, nemaju prava to da rade, jedino ako je server odredjenog domena na teritoriji USA
 
Demokratija na vrhuncu...
 
Sarkazam i cinizam:D
Amerika je čudo jedno, zabraniće sami sebe jednog dana:D
 
Jao samo da cenurišu facebook :D
 
Znaci po ovom ispadne da po nalogu neke medijske kuce jer si ne znam sta na tvom sajtu radio COICA moze da uradi kompletan shut down sajta bilo gde u svetu.
Preterase ga malo...

Evo malo detaljnije sto sam nasao na EFF sajtu:


The COICA Internet Censorship and Copyright Bill

The "Combating Online Infringements and Counterfeits Act" (COICA) is an Internet censorship bill which is rapidly making its way through the Senate. Although it is ostensibly focused on copyright infringement, an enormous amount of noninfringing content, including political and other speech, could disappear off the Web if it passes.

The main mechanism of the bill is to interfere with the Internet's domain name system (DNS), which translates names like "www.eff.org" or "www.nytimes.com" into the IP addresses that computers use to communicate. The bill creates two blacklists of censored domains. The first is longer, and includes any sites where the DOJ decides that infringement is "central" to the purpose of the site. The bill gives ISPs and registrars strong legal incentives to censor the domains on that list. The Attorney General can also ask a court to put sites on a second, shorter blacklist; ISPs and registrars are required by law to censor those sites.

If this bill passes, the list of targets could conceivably include hosting websites such as Dropbox, MediaFire and Rapidshare; MP3 blogs and mashup/remix music sites like SoundCloud, MashupTown and Hype Machine ; and sites that discuss and make the controversial political and intellectual case for piracy, like pirate-party.us, p2pnet, InfoAnarchy, Slyck and ZeroPaid . Indeed, had this bill been passed five or ten years ago, YouTube might not exist today. In other words, the collateral damage from this legislation would be enormous. (Why would all these sites be targets?)

There are already laws and procedures in place for taking down sites that violate the law. This act would allow the Attorney General to censor sites even when no court has found they have infringed copyright or any other law.
 
Zasto jednostavno ne bi samo iskljucili internet u celom svetu :) :smash::smash:
 
Era slobode na internetu polako prolazi.

Ne znam da li pratite, ali poslednjih nedelja se vodi pravi rat na internetu (Operation: Payback is bitch).

U Francuskoj je počeo nedavno da se primenjuje HADOPI zakon.

Počeo je žalbeni apelacioni postupak ekipe sa TPB-a.

Ukucajte ACS Law u Google pa ćete videti šta se dešava u UK poslednjih dana.

Samo čekam kada će i kod nas da se izglasa nešto slično (BIA je već dobila šta joj treba).
 
illidan je napisao(la):
pa ne smeju, to je intenacionalni domen, nemaju prava to da rade, jedino ako je server odredjenog domena na teritoriji USA
Kliknite za proširenje...
Ne znam kako do sad nisi skapirao da kad je USA u pitanju rec "prava" nikako nije potrebna,sta vise suvisna je,oni prosto mogu da urade sta kod im je volja,bilo gde u svetu,zato sto im je to dozvoljeno_Oni su se gistro borili protiv fasizma i jednoumlja a sada ga i sami polako sprovode uvijenog u fini celofan.
 
Poslednja izmena:
Jednoumlje all the way, bitno da oni mogu šta hoće a ostale ko *ebe.
 
blah, ionako ce da se ostvari ono sto je igoritza predvideo jos davne 2006 - 2012 nece imati tehnologiju.

ne na konto nikakvih nebuloza od strane maja, i orion planeta i ostalih bulshita, vec na konto najpredvidivije i najopasnije stvari - choveka.

3WW is upon us, be afraid, be very afraid.
 
Update, from EFF's website: the Senate Judiciary Committee postponed the scheduled markup of the Internet censorship bill — a fantastic outcome, given that the entertainment industry and their allies in Congress had hoped this bill would be quickly approved before the Senators went home for the October recess. Massive thanks to all who used the EFF Action Center to write to your Senators to oppose this bill.

@ Igoritza: i koa sto rece Ajnstajn:Ne znam za 3WW kako ce se ratovati,ali u 4WW ce se ratovati kamenjem...
 
Poslednja izmena:
skidajte dok jos ima sta da se skine sa neta... jos malo pa nestalo :D

realno, ako sve download sajtove pogase, da li ce internet uopste imati svrhu ?

da, ovaj, sad se setih pr0n-a :D
 
Prosečnog Amera je baš pogodila ova vest. 80% njih ne zna ko im je predsednik, (al bar žive ko ljudi). :)
 
ypow je napisao(la):
realno, ako sve download sajtove pogase, da li ce internet uopste imati svrhu ?
Kliknite za proširenje...

Ma opustite umesto rapidshare.com bice rapidshare.ru, umesto thepiratebay.org bice thepiratebay.ru, itd :)
 
Ako nas braca Ruje ne izvuku, niko nece :D cisto da skidaju profit amerima piraterijom
 
Morate se prijaviti ili registrovati da odgovorite ovde.
Nazad
Vrh Dno