Šta je novo?
Od:
Filteri

Windows 10 (FAQ u drugom postu)

Gde ima da se pročita, onako step by step, kako instalisati Windows 10 na nov računar, ali u UEFI boot modu ? Na šta obratiti pažnju, da ne bude Legacy mod ? Da li je najvažnije kako na pravi način napraviti instalacioni USB ?
 
Ništa naročito ne treba, Prazan (RAW format) disk, UEFI samo namešteno u BIOS-u (disable CSM) i windows sve urade sami, particije itd.
 
CountMike je napisao(la):
Ništa naročito ne treba, Prazan (RAW format) disk, UEFI samo namešteno u BIOS-u (disable CSM) i windows sve urade sami, particije itd.
Kliknite za proširenje...

Jel CSM po default-u disabled na pločama ili treba ručno na to postaviti ? Nešto se sećam da kad se CSM postavi na disabled da se brišu neke šifre ? Znači ne treba na neki poseban način pripremiti USB flash ?

Da li se dobije nešto brži boot ili ima drugih prednosti ?

Ploča je Asus Maximus X (Z 370). CPU i7 8700K.
 
Poslednja izmena:
Moze li meni link za windows 10 bez bloatware,otpima mod ili neki drugi.
Imam home verziju x64 i sa zadnjim apdejtom vidi da jede vise rama.
Ili da se vratim na windows 8?
I desava se da se mis zaglupi,vidim da nemam ps/2 keyboard drajver ali je tastatura usb,iobot driver booster mi prijavljuje gresku 24 na ps/2.
 
Poslednja izmena:
Ako imaš 8GB ili više, zaboravi na "Pojedenu memoriju" Samo izgleda da jede puno ali većina je u Stand by-u i oslobodi se kada zatreba. Uopšte nije isto kao u predhodnim windowsima. Što je više u memoriji umesto na disku to brže radi, ako imaš manje od 8GB, vreme je za upgrade. Memorija koja zvrji prazna su samo bačene pare.
 
Mislim da ipak jos zivimo u srbiji.
Koji sistem za 4gb rama,win 8.1?
 
CountMike je napisao(la):
Ako imaš 8GB ili više, zaboravi na "Pojedenu memoriju" Samo izgleda da jede puno ali većina je u Stand by-u i oslobodi se kada zatreba. Uopšte nije isto kao u predhodnim windowsima. Što je više u memoriji umesto na disku to brže radi, ako imaš manje od 8GB, vreme je za upgrade. Memorija koja zvrji prazna su samo bačene pare.
Kliknite za proširenje...
Nije tacno. Memorija koju zauzima OS a ne aplikacije su bacene pare. 10ka jede puno i kad pojede sve pocne da drlja tj. koristi pagefile. 8.1 i manje jede i manje drlja i brzi je. 10ka samo kome treba (za igrice i sl.) i ko ima bar 8GB i SSD.
 
Ovo je u Clean BOOT mode, znači bez ikakvih stvari u pozadini koje jedu najviše memorije.
Memory.JPG
Pa sad ako je to mnogo.....
 
amdpower je napisao(la):
Moze li meni link za windows 10 bez bloatware,otpima mod ili neki drugi.
Imam home verziju x64 i sa zadnjim apdejtom vidi da jede vise rama.
Ili da se vratim na windows 8?
I desava se da se mis zaglupi,vidim da nemam ps/2 keyboard drajver ali je tastatura usb,iobot driver booster mi prijavljuje gresku 24 na ps/2.
Kliknite za proširenje...

Ignoriši iobit Driver Booster mada je moguće da ti je on napravio taj problem sa mišem pod uslovom da si taj miš provjerio na drugom računaru i utvrdio da je potpuno ispravan. Windows 10 bez bloatwarea se zove Windows 10 Enterprise 2016 LTSB i Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019 pa vidi koji ti više odgovara. LTSB/LTSC verzije imaju podršku od 10 godina, ne dobijaju feature update na svakih 6 mjeseci te nemaju Cortanu, Store, Edge i ostale UWP aplikacije. Problem ti mogu jedino praviti AMD i Nvidia drajveri ako nekad kupiš neku novu generaciju.

S obzirom da sam imao priliku koristiti i 8.1 i 2016 na laptopu sa HDD-om, mogu reći samo da 8.1 brže pokretao Windows, ali mu je više vremena trebalo da učita neke stvari kasnije.
 
Koji bensedin koristite,ja sam do sad koristio KMS_VL_ALL,ili preporucujete KMSpico,AAct.
 
Kako da permanentno izbacim Windows Defender iz skroz legalne instalacije?
Pitam jer treba na takvom VMu da testiram, a znam da klijenti koriste obican W10 na kome nece sigurno instalirati nesto sa Guru3D, a kamoli nesto manje ozbiljno :(

Deaktiviram ga, izadjem, pogledam TM, Antimalware trashuje CPU i dalje... odem nazad, Real-time protection opet aktivan!
Deaktivate... nazad, OK, nije aktivan.. reboot - aktivan!

Treba mi pravi bensedin, VM je neupotrebljiv, meni brze radi W7 na matorom Pentium 3, bez imalo sale.
 
Gpedit.msc

Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Windows Components > Windows Defender.

Polisa je turn off windows defender, stavi je na enable.
 
Ovo je perma posle reboot-a, nista ne radi WD?
 
Nope...mrtav
 
Kakva je sada situacija sa ovim 1903, može da se instalira, ne pravi probleme?
 
Ako hoće sam preko windows updejta onda ga pusti da instalira a ako neće nemoj da forsiraš.
 
amdpower je napisao(la):
Koji bensedin koristite,ja sam do sad koristio KMS_VL_ALL,ili preporucujete KMSpico,AAct.
Kliknite za proširenje...
Key za Win košta 1€ na ebay, za Office 2-3, da li je realno da se neko i dalje zamajava sa krekovima, kms-ovima, i sl. i rizikuje majnere, ransomware i ostalu gamad.
 
djalf je napisao(la):
Rizikuje kad ne zna za Digital License Generator gde dobija licencu free.
Kliknite za proširenje...

Ja ni to ne koristim iako ga posedujem. Iako sam zamenuo i ploču i procesor on se sam aktivirao na Digital licence. :D
 
Ako pogledaš malo bolje, jasno ćeš videti da je sve sa domena microsoft.com.
 
Ako ti baš treba 1709, imaš i ovde:

https://tb.32767.ga/get.php?id=484

Uvek je krajnja destinacija ista, a to je microsoft techbench.

Tu je i ESD, ako neko želi:

Kod: 
http://fg.ds.b1.download.windowsupdate.com/d/Upgr/2017/10/16299.15.170928-1534.rs3_release_clientconsumer_ret_x86fre_en-us_1ad866a4a9b80e05103c60aaa62ef57613b9b917.esd
http://fg.ds.b1.download.windowsupdate.com/d/Upgr/2017/10/16299.15.170928-1534.rs3_release_clientconsumer_ret_x64fre_en-us_f6df8c19358335bc05e638b45bb6c6f8078480a4.esd

http://fg.ds.b1.download.windowsupdate.com/c/Upgr/2017/10/16299.15.170928-1534.rs3_release_clientconsumer_ret_x86fre_sr-latn-rs_2ba0df2679b700255c3c34a12174fb6748f8bc8d.esd
http://fg.ds.b1.download.windowsupdate.com/c/Upgr/2017/10/16299.15.170928-1534.rs3_release_clientconsumer_ret_x64fre_sr-latn-rs_606028c1a9351f50754b624f3a8344a6bd08b407.esd

Dobro, nećemo sad o UUP-u i SVF-u. :D Ima dovoljno informacija. :D

Poenta je da uvek možete imati bilo koji w10, pa i onaj "RTM" 10240 i to ne samo na jedan način. Uvek ću pisati samo o onom što izdaje M$, jer samo tako ćete skinuti odgovornost sa sebe.
 
Nakon apdejta drajvera za zvuk,start meni je umro tj ne pojavljuje se,ima je samo ikonica,takodje i ikonice za net,zvuk i notifikacije ali na levi klik ne reaguju samo na desni.
Valjda sam lepo objasnio.
 
The Need for a Software QA Role at Microsoft

Dear Microsoft,

I hope you remember me. I used to work for you. I was an SDE in Dublin working on Office for Mac and an SDET in Redmond working on products like Silverlight, Windows Live Mesh, and Azure Service Bus. During those years I learnt a lot about software engineering in general and software quality in particular and did some of my best work, all thanks to you. I still care deeply for you and your products which is why I'm very concerned and saddened by what I'm seeing recently. And it all started in 2014.

Getting rid of the SDET role

Back then I was still working for you and you decided to get rid of the SDET role which made the SDE role fully responsible for both implementing and testing their products. At that point I had some exposure to engineering teams without any dedicated QA so I knew that this can work. I did have my doubts though that it would work for a software company as large as Microsoft with products as complex as Windows. However, I do want to commend you for taking that step. You cannot innovate without trying new, sometimes radical, ideas and this of course doesn't just apply to products and features but processes and roles as well. But here is the catch: Whenever you do this you must be prepared to impartially evaluate the outcome. I know this is often much easier said than done, but if you don't do it and complacency, pride, or office politics get in the way of an open and honest analysis, you may keep walking down a path you've chosen even though you should have taken a turn miles ago.

The current state of software QA at Microsoft

Granted, I don't have the same insight into what's going on anymore. But based on my experience as a former employee, a current customer, and a software engineer, I'm afraid I've come to the conclusion that what you're doing isn't working. And I've talked to quite a few other (former) Microsofties, customers, and partners who agree. But this, of course, is only circumstantial. But there are also cold hard facts to back it up.

Measuring software quality

So, how can we measure software quality? This is an incredibly difficult question about which entire books have been written. But in this context there's one that's particularly meaningful: The number of recalls and severe regressions. Ideally, you should never miss a defect warranting a recall and severe regressions should be a rare exception. However, using Windows, probably the most widely used Microsoft product, as an example, your track record of just the past few months isn't great. Issues included (and this is by no means a complete list):

Breaking a brand new and really cool security feature just when hitting GA: (Microsoft Admits Windows 10 Security Feature Broken By Update)
Breaking a feature that had worked fine for over 20 years: (Windows' latest patches crash Event Viewer)
Accidentally downgrading and invalidating licenses: (Microsoft Accidentally Downgrades Windows 10 Pro To Home)
Deleting user data: (Microsoft Warns Windows 10 Update Deletes Personal Data)

The last one is particularly mind boggling. I've never worked on Windows but all teams I've been a part of would have considered this a priority 0, severity 0, hard ship-blocker issue, especially since it was apparently reported by Windows Insiders before GA. I can think of a range of possible explanations for this, but given the overall circumstances a likely cause, or at least major contributing factor, was probably a lack of ownership. Yes, the SDEs should have owned it in the engineering team model, but in that very model nobody specializes in QA and is explicitly responsible for QA. Which brings me to my next point.

QA roles at other companies

Back in 2014 I had my concerns but was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. Maybe you were on to something here, way ahead of the curve. You had been in the past on numerous occasions and it's one of the things I love about you. But, realistically, if that had been the case, it would have caught on by now. And it hasn't. Google has a Test Engineer role and Amazon has both a Quality Assurance Engineer (QAE) and a Software Development Engineer in Test (SDET) role. Most other major technology companies have similar roles.

On a more personal note, I have interviewed with a few companies that were interested in my background because they wanted to professionalize and intensify their software QA effort, creating or expanding dedicated QA teams. I hope we are on the same page when I state this: Software QA is a specialization within software engineering that takes years to master. Now, you might argue that every SDE could also acquire this knowledge over time but there are two issues. First, this goes against the principle of division of labour without which we wouldn't be where we are today technologically. Second, and worse yet, there are many great software engineers who excel when it comes to the design and implementation, but who simply don't have enough of an interested in QA beyond what's normally expected of an SDE.

How did we get here?

I actually lost my T before we split in 2014, having been "promoted" from SDET to SDE. I don't recall what the official reason for this change was (which isn't to say that there wasn't one) but I do recall two explanations offered by other (former) Microsofties I discussed this with.

Ineffectiveness of the SDET role

One was that the SDET role simply had ceased to add value to the development process. Personally, I take issue with this. This may have been true in some groups but I can say with certainty that this wasn't true for the groups I was a member of. But even if that had been the case in parts of the company, why would one jump directly to axing the entire role rather than trying to redefine it?

The SDET role being unsuited for agile processes

The other argument is more interesting and superficially plausible. You wanted to move to an agile development model and the SDET role was simply incompatible. But again, even if this were the case, why not try to evolve the role with the changing processes? This is, in fact, what has happened in the industry at large. ISTQB recently introduced an Agile Tester Extension certification and is currently working on an advanced level Agile Technical Tester certification. There are even conferences focusing on this like the Agile Testing Days in Potsdam.

So what now?

From my point of view, what needs to happen is very clear: You need to reintroduce a software QA role. And the sooner the better. It doesn't have to be the old SDET role. It's certainly possible it wasn't working for all groups anymore. It's also plausible that it would have needed to change to be more suitable for an agile environment. And there are probably other considerations I'm not even aware of. But I honestly believe that at this point not having any role that explicitly and primarily own software quality and, in this regard, acts as a customer advocate has been proven to not work.

Sincerely yours,

D.C.

P.S. In case you agree, give me a call once you decide to "hit refresh" on the software QA role. I'd love to be a part of redefining it.
Kliknite za proširenje...
 
p0RQiUX.png


Zasto mi windows sam 'purchase-uje' ove aplikacije. Da napomenem da nisam ulogovan u microsoft store, nisam probao kada sam ulogovan.
 
Morate se prijaviti ili registrovati da odgovorite ovde.
Nazad
Vrh Dno