jesi li ti pročitao komentar arstechnice u tom tekstu:
"Some of the points Microsoft makes in its statement are controversial, though it's not all simple PR talk. Plugins and add-ons are definitely a huge security issue; they usually remain unpatched longer than most and often end up doing more damage than vulnerabilities in the actual browser. As for IE + Google Chrome Frame potentially allowing for double the damage because the browser mutant would be open to a wider range of attacks, we're going to have to call foul. Somehow we doubt there is a significant amount of malware specifically targeting Chrome, and for whatever exists, we're pretty sure most would fail when encountering IE + Google Chrome Frame. These Web attacks would be written to be able to circumvent Chrome's security measures and would simply not expect Internet Explorer's security layers."
osim toga, ovo je sve manje bitno (btw Apple je u Safariju uveo sandboxing pluginova jer Flash na Mac-u često pravi probleme) ono što je bitno je da Microsoft ponovo polušava da izbegne Open HTML 5 standard koji će mu ozbiljno narušiti OS biznis i monopolsku poziciju koju ima.
Njegovi Web servisi ionako donose samo gubitke:
Microsoft: Windows Live and Mobile Services unprofitable
tako da najverovatnije ni nema interes da podržava HTML5 od kojeg će najviše koristi imati Google sa sve uspešnijim online servisima!
pored toga, Microsoft ni nema uspešan biznis u online reklamiranju... tako da mu sve ovo (napredak web-a) ide samo na štetu.
pročitaj prvi članak koji sam ostavio u postu #3 sa roughlydrafted o istoriji HTML-a
link
