Crysis Warhead Benchmark CPU/GPU [1280x1024] Gamer/Enthusiast

[PCBeast]

Danasnje jace graficke su gladne performansi procesora. Naime usko grlo je CPU
Da bi osetio znacajan benefit mocne graficke kartice moras je upariti i sa odredjeno clocknutim procesorom da bi to lepo harmoniralo.

evo moj skromni doprinos :

Tacno ali uglavnom najvise se odnosi na X2-jku kojoj treba minimalno Intel Quad CPU da bi radila valjano bez velikih podbacaja...Kod nVidie GTX 280 recimo toga nema u toj meri...Recimo GTX260 se dosta cudnije ponasa od GTX-a 280 bez i malo logike!On je bas zavistan od CPU-a i tako i reaguje na same performanse dok GTX280 radi uglavnom samostalno bez prevelikih oscilacija!Malo vise gore imaju testovi koji potvrdjuju ovo ovde izneto!

[Hector Ruiz]

Moj skor:

[Marac]

Kod mene na def. grafička, def. proc. 3.0 GHz je avrg. ~35 FPS na enthusiast 1680x1050, Win XP SP2

[MadeOfIron]

E4400 @ 3GHz, 8800GT 512MB @ 730/1700/1000MHz

================================================== ============
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 3502, Recorded Time: 92.69s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 89.61s, Average FPS: 39.08
Min FPS: 21.00 at frame 72, Max FPS: 54.41 at frame 738
Average Tri/Sec: -1035548, Tri/Frame: -26499
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -19.70
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 88.42s, Average FPS: 39.61
Min FPS: 20.46 at frame 66, Max FPS: 54.41 at frame 738
Average Tri/Sec: -240761, Tri/Frame: -6078
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -85.89
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 87.90s, Average FPS: 39.84
Min FPS: 20.46 at frame 66, Max FPS: 56.75 at frame 762
Average Tri/Sec: -385000, Tri/Frame: -9663
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -54.02
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
================================================== ============

03/20/2009 00:03:13 - Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3

DirectX 9.0c GAMER 3X @ Map: ambush @ 0 1280 x 1024 AA 0xx
==> Framerate [ Min: 20.46 Max: 55.58 Avg: 39.73 ]


================================================== ============
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 3502, Recorded Time: 92.69s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 132.60s, Average FPS: 26.41
Min FPS: 17.72 at frame 2267, Max FPS: 34.77 at frame 741
Average Tri/Sec: 10541092, Tri/Frame: 399128
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.31
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 131.61s, Average FPS: 26.61
Min FPS: 17.72 at frame 2267, Max FPS: 34.77 at frame 741
Average Tri/Sec: 11156585, Tri/Frame: 419281
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.25
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 131.35s, Average FPS: 26.66
Min FPS: 17.72 at frame 2267, Max FPS: 34.77 at frame 741
Average Tri/Sec: 11309678, Tri/Frame: 424183
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.23
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
================================================== ============

03/20/2009 00:11:57 - Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3

DirectX 9.0c ENTHUSIAST 3X @ Map: ambush @ 0 1280 x 1024 AA 0xx
==> Framerate [ Min: 17.72 Max: 34.77 Avg: 26.64 ]


================================================== ============
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 3502, Recorded Time: 92.69s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 111.40s, Average FPS: 31.44
Min FPS: 20.82 at frame 68, Max FPS: 43.88 at frame 745
Average Tri/Sec: 2949974, Tri/Frame: 93840
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 5.56
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 109.58s, Average FPS: 31.96
Min FPS: 19.61 at frame 62, Max FPS: 44.92 at frame 756
Average Tri/Sec: 3673734, Tri/Frame: 114949
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 4.54
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 109.93s, Average FPS: 31.86
Min FPS: 19.61 at frame 62, Max FPS: 45.02 at frame 766
Average Tri/Sec: 3839883, Tri/Frame: 120533
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 4.33
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
================================================== ============

03/20/2009 00:23:03 - Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3

DirectX 9.0c GAMER 3X @ Map: ambush @ 0 1680 x 1050 AA 0xx
==> Framerate [ Min: 19.61 Max: 44.97 Avg: 31.91 ]


Definitivno je mnogo igrivije na 16x10 na Gamer, nego na 12x10 na Enthusiast.

[Sharpshooter]

Evo test i sa jednom 4830 klokovanom na 810/1050 i E6420@3600. Ubaciću ovih dana i test sa 2 4830 u CF.

[MadeOfIron]

Jel mozes da odradis sa procesorom klokovanim na 3GHz, bas da vidimo, koja je razlika tvoje i moje graficke .

[Sharpshooter]

Jel mozes da odradis sa procesorom klokovanim na 3GHz, bas da vidimo, koja je razlika tvoje i moje graficke .

Ako stignem danas izvrteću, ali sumljam da ću da to nešto značu kada je igra GPU ograničena. Ubaciću i test na def. taktovima grafičke (575/900) tu će tek da se vidi razlika. Bilo bi lepo da provrtiš i ti 8800GT na def 600/900 da vidimo kojoj bolje Crysis leži.

Inače imao sam 8800GT pre ovoga Radeona i zamenio sam je samo zbog CF.

[MadeOfIron]

Moja radi po defaultu na 700/1000MHz (iChill 8800GT je u pitanju), pa ne bih da je downclockujem .
Mogu da odradim nije problem, ali meni je zanimljivo videti poredjenje oc grafickih. 8800GT u proseku ide na 700/1000MHz , no uradicu.

Veceras radim na 600/900MHz, a ti radi na def te 4830, i na njen max overclock, ali oba testa sa procesorom na 3GHz. Mada tvoj pocesor ima duplo vise kesha nego moj, verovatno to ima uticaj na fps, mada je to 1-5%, grubo.

[MadeOfIron]

Evo rezultata (u medjuvremenu sam promenio procesor, umesto E4400 @3GHz, sada je u masini E5200 @3GHz (samo trenutno )):
Prethodni ^ rezultati su 99% isti (8800GT @730/700/1000MHz), sto je i logicno, ista brzina, ista kolicina kesh memorije, E5xxx je po performansama/ceni zamenila E4xxx seriju u potpunosti .

Znaci E5200 @3GHz, 4GB DDR2 @800MHz CL5.


1280x1024, Gamer

1.) 8800GT 512MB @ default: 600/1500/900MHz

DirectX 9.0c GAMER 3X @ Map: ambush @ 0 1280 x 1024 AA 0xx
==> Framerate [ Min: 19.50 Max: 48.79 Avg: 35.26 ]

2.) 8800GT 512MB @ 730/1700/1000MHz

DirectX 9.0c GAMER 3X @ Map: ambush @ 0 1280 x 1024 AA 0xx
==> Framerate [ Min: 21.30 Max: 55.76 Avg: 39.76 ]

Ubrzanje: min, max, avg
9,23%, 14,29%, 12,76%
------------------------------------------------

1280x1024, Enthusiast

1.) 8800GT 512MB @ default: 600/1500/900MHz

DirectX 9.0c ENTHUSIAST 3X @ Map: ambush @ 0 1280 x 1024 AA 0xx
==> Framerate [ Min: 15.64 Max: 29.86 Avg: 23.70 ]

2.) 8800GT 512MB @ 730/1700/1000MHz

DirectX 9.0c ENTHUSIAST 3X @ Map: ambush @ 0 1280 x 1024 AA 0xx
==> Framerate [ Min: 17.46 Max: 34.98 Avg: 26.64 ]

Ubrzanje: min, max, avg
11,63%, 17,14%, 12,41%

[MadeOfIron]

E5200 @3,5GHz, 8800GT @730/1700/1000MHz

------------------------------------------

1280x1024, Gamer

DirectX 9.0c GAMER 3X @ Map: ambush @ 0 1280 x 1024 AA 0xx
==> Framerate [ Min: 25.29 Max: 56.80 Avg: 40.11 ]

(E5200 @3GHz: Min: 21.30 Max: 55.76 Avg: 39.76 )

Znaci za 500MHz vece brzine, dobio sam dosta veci min fps.

-----------------------------------------

1280x1024, Enthusiast

DirectX 9.0c ENTHUSIAST 3X @ Map: ambush @ 0 1280 x 1024 AA 0xx
==> Framerate [ Min: 18.31 Max: 34.26 Avg: 26.58 ]

(E5200 @3GHz:Min: 17.46 Max: 34.98 Avg: 26.64 ] )

Ovde za 500MHz vise, skoro nikakva ubrzanja, sto znaci da je ovoj 8800GT na ovom taktu 730/1700/1000MHz ovih procesorskih 3,5GHz puna kapa .


Sharp imas veci skor sa E6420 @3,6GHz i 4830 dosta klokovanom .
Sacu da poguram ovaj moj E5200 na 3,6GHz i max da overklokujem graficku.
Ipak tesko da cu stici tvoj skor, znaci mozda tih 2MB kesha vishe, al ocigledno i da je 4830 malo brza od 8800GT, barem klok vs. klok, za def mislim da je malo sporija .

[TheBear]

AMD X2 5600+ @ 3200Mhz, Asus 9800GTX+ Dark Knight TOP @ 775/1950/2360

Izgleda da me AMD koci inace bi bio i veci skor, min. FPS mi je dosta nizak pretpostavljam da je zbog procesora.

[TheBear]

AMD X2 5600+ @ 3200Mhz, Asus 9800GTX+ Dark Knight TOP @ 810 / 2040 / 2700

GAMER, 1280x1024

MIN:15,98 MAX:63,88 AVG:42,12

ENTHUSIAST, 1280x1024

MIN: 14,85 MAX: 45,81 AVG: 32,75

[Maverick78]

Intel C2D e7400@3.8ghz, Asus P5Q pro, 4x2gb ddr2 800 Kingston, Gainward GTX285@740/1624/1400
1280x1024, Enthusiast, 0xAA, avg. 49,59fps (min. 26.48, max. 63.29)

[Budak]

Ne nadjoh temu za 1680x1050 rezoluciju, pa cu staviti ovde:

E5200 @3,75GHz, 4GB Ram, Win Xp (DX9), 4870 512MB @ default

Gamer:

DirectX 9.0c GAMER 3X @ Map: ambush @ 0 1680 x 1050 AA 0xx
==> Framerate [ Min: 24.10 Max: 53.90 Avg: 42.44 ]

Enthusiastic:

DirectX 9.0c ENTHUSIAST 3X @ Map: ambush @ 0 1680 x 1050 AA 0xx
==> Framerate [ Min: 15.31 Max: 36.60 Avg: 29.34 ]

Overklokovanjem sa 750/950MHz na 790/1050MHz dobio sam u oba slucaja oko 2fps veci avg fps, a pri tom je ventilator graficke morao biti stavljen na 70% (manji radi const na 5V) kako ne bi graficka blokirala.
Tako da nema svrhe overklokovati graficku.

Jel ima neko 4870 512MB da je odradio testove, cisto da uporedim.

[Vlaxii]

Intel Core i7 @ 2.66,HIS 4890 950/1100...Evo rezultata.